![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| 註冊 | Gallery | 部落格 | 論壇輔助說明 | 會員名單 | 行事曆事件 | 搜尋 | 今日新文章 | 標記討論區已讀 |
| 國際攀岩資訊 提供國外攀岩訊息,國外攀岩雜誌翻譯文章. |
|
|
主題工具 |
2007-06-23, 20:58
|
#1 |
|
論壇管理員
|
[國際攀岩資訊] 香港討論打bolt的文章(也是為了繩索訓練)
香港討論打bolt的文章(也是為了繩索訓練)
http://www.hongkongclimbing.com/phpB...opic.php?t=585 這情境跟台灣之前的一些討論很像 --------------恕刪------------- As the introduction of rope access / rope rescue / caving SRT is such a new thing in Hong Kong, ordinary climbers would find it hard to understand what these skills are and how comes there are so a lot of bolts. Things seem just like the bolts were put into the rock in a crazy and illogical manner. Actually a similar case happened in Long Dong, Taiwan recently. A Taiwanese mountain guide / rope rescue expert was organizing a vertical rope rescue training course last year in July. He was (with a non-Taiwanese instructor) looking for a place in Long Dong where it’s not so “popular” to climbers and then bolted it. Quite a large number of bolts were installed. After that the training course was conducted. The Taiwanese expert has been using the site quite some other times for that purpose later on. However in Spring 2007, some other climbers “discovered” the bolts and saying the bolts were installed in a crazy manner (according to the point of view of climbing). Serious discussion was triggered. The Taiwanese mountain guide was explaining his point of view and the rationale behind it. Finally the climbers understood and expressed his support towards this issue. ---------------------恕刪----------------- 這一段也把台灣的討論帶了進來 但是我們有達成共識了嗎?? #繩索技術課程及固定點設置討論 #冤有頭債有主?? #滑輪拖拉技術課程(Pulley Hauling) 關於原文 如果英文不OK 這裡有大概的翻譯(翻譯的不好,請自行參考) 關於bolt設置延伸閱讀 #[討論]〔To Bolt or Not To Be〕如何保存、更新、開發龍洞的運動攀登路線? #再談 「To bolt or not to be」 #VCC天然岩場打路線政策(澳洲) #[討論]天然岩場打bolts原則 #To Bolt or Not To Be?
__________________
------------------------------------------------- what do you do in your life...? ............. i live ,i Climb....... ..... 此文章於 2007-06-23 21:39 被 ed512 編輯. |
|
2007-06-23, 22:11
|
#2 |
|
接觸攀言
註冊日期: 2007-06
文章: 1
![]() |
http://www.hkwei.com/forum/viewthread.php?tid=56597
打bolt人士於此討論區就有關事件作出回應 此文章於 2007-06-27 22:10 被 千鳥~ 編輯. |
|
2007-06-25, 15:25
|
#3 |
|
論壇管理員
|
96/06/24最新發展
香港耳片事件
96/06/24 最新發展 所有耳片(55顆)被人(非設置者)主動移除 牆壁已想辦法恢復原有狀態(顏色) 詳情請參考前述網址 照片轉貼自www.hongkongclimbing.com/
__________________
------------------------------------------------- what do you do in your life...? ............. i live ,i Climb....... ..... |
|
2007-06-25, 19:55
|
#4 |
|
週末攀言者
註冊日期: 1999-11
文章: 39
![]() |
10分鐘是那裡
我又看了一遍,有幾點疑問:
1. 上次B-II和這次香港的照片看起來很像,初期發展、結果也差不多 2. 但我又看了一次;關於之前(四月、五月)繩索技術課程在龍洞Bolt被移除事件的整理 Quote:"上個月(五月)月初,我再一次地為了繩索技術訓練場地去了龍洞後門,因為之前訓練場地的Bolt被移除了,而為了日後繩索技術訓練課程,我重新在原來的位置再往裡面走大約10分鐘的步程,找到一個合適操作繩索技術訓練的環境,同時這個場地幾乎是完全避開了平日龍洞攀岩愛好者從事攀岩的路線。" 10分鐘如果不過去到黃金谷;往上,那就是鱷魚稜的大斜板,龍洞後門難得的傳統路線攀登區域,雖然爬的人不多,但我們在此活動已經很久了。往下,受海風侵蝕嚴重,也有浪湧的威脅。 3. 龍洞說大不大,說小也有"完全避開"攀登者的區域,如果是從上次地點往北走的話,是都有攀登路線的 很擔心舊事又重演,北部海岸和東北角那麼多的岩壁,難道都找不到繩索訓練的適當場地?有沒有人建議一下? |
|
2007-06-30, 17:26
|
#7 | |
|
中度攀言者
註冊日期: 2003-10
文章: 97
![]() |
引用:
請看他的意見 http://www.hongkongclimbing.com/phpB...opic.php?t=585 |
|
|